Legal Opinion
Vessey & Co., Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1989No. Docket Nos. D007124, D007175PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
Vessey & Company, Inc. (Vessey) and Carl Maggio, dba Maggio Farms (Maggio), petition this court under Labor Code section 1160.8 2 for review of Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) decision 13 ALRB No. 17, which determined Vessey and Maggio, separately and collectively, engaged in lawful bargaining with the United Farm Workers of America (UFW) but violated sections 1153 (a) and (c); Maggio failed to treat, with the exception of its tractor drivers and irrigators, the returning strikers’ offers to return to work in a nondiscriminatory fashion and Vessey failed…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ritland v. Arizona State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Coastal Berry Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- City of South Pasadena v. Public Employment etc. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- County of San Joaquin v. Public Employment Relations Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.