Legal Opinion
Michael Hat Farming Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 1992No. H008180PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, Acting P. J.—
1. Introduction
Michael Hat 1 petitions this court to set aside a February 1991 decision by California’s Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB) determining petitioner to be an agricultural, joint successor employer obliged to bargain in good faith with the United Farm Workers of America, AFL-CIO (UFW), real party in interest. The ALRB decision affirmed a decision by an administrative law judge. It orders petitioner to bargain collectively in good faith with the UFW; to honor the terms and conditions of a collective bargaining agreement between the UFW and a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Rivcom Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Montebello Rose Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Martori Bros. Distributors v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- UFW v. Dutra FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Superior Care Facilities v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Agric. Labor Relations Bd. v. Superior Court of San Benito Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- United Farm Workers of America v. Dutra FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000