Wyman v. Hooker
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGray, P. J.
This is an action to recover the sum of $2,455.66, alleged to be due upon a certain builder’s contract, and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien securing the same. The plaintiff had judgment for $1,665.57, and for costs, and a decree of foreclosure, from all of which, and from an order denying a new trial, the defendant appeals.
The builder’s contract provides that the work shall be done under the direction and to the satisfaction of the architect. It further provides for payments as follows: 1 ‘ $2,000 when walls are up ready to receive the trusses; $2,000 when roof on, copings of wall cemented and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Adams v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. Ah BeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Loup v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by21 opinions
- American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Headley v. CavileerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- C. F. Bolster Co. v. J. C. Boespflug Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- 1st Olympic Corp. v. HawrylukCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Howard J. White, Inc. v. Varian AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.