Legal Opinion
Headley v. Cavileer
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 4, 1912PublishedCited by 22 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
The controversy in this case relates to a claim for extra work on a building in Atlantic City erected by plaintiff, Headley, for the defendant under a written contract and specifications. These specifications, which are referred to in the contract as annexed thereto as part thereof, contain the following clause:
"Alterations.—At any time directed by the owner, the contractor shall make aiw alterations, additions or omissions from the plans and specifications without affecting the valid*636ity of the contract, but the price of all work shall be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Bartlett v. StanchfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Wood v. Fort WayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Smith v. GugertyNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Davis v. La Crosse Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Freeman v. Stanbern Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Salvatore v. TraceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Pinnacle Mortgage Investment Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Dries v. Trenton Oil Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.