Legal Opinion

McComb v. Cogswell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that he entered into a written contract with defendant, Martha Cogswell, to construct certain buildings in accordance with certain plans and specifications; that he did construct said buildings according to the terms and conditions of said contract and completed the same on July 28,1930, on which date Martha Cogs-well accepted the same. That the contract price was $3,250, which was all paid excepting the sum of $500. Under the contract, this was the fourth installment and and the contract provided that it should “be kept by the party of the first part until…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Wolke v. SchmidtOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Graf v. PetryOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. De Young v. CrooksOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Birkemeier v. KnobelOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Newlee v. HeytingOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Montara Owners Ass'n v. La Noue Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Montara Owners Ass'n v. La Noue Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API