Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Montara Owners Ass'n v. La Noue Development, LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 2013No. 051213487, 061213628; A140771Published

1ConcurrenceNakamoto, J.

We hold, contrary to the customary burden of proof, see North Pacific Lbr. v. Moore, 275 Or 359, 366, 551 P2d 431 (1976), that third-party defendant Sharabarin — not third-party plaintiff La Noue Development, LLC — had the burden to establish the amount of damages that La Noue could recover under the alternative measure of damages that Sharabarin argued should apply. 259 Or App at 665 n 3. Although I agree that Sharabarin was required to establish the amount of the diminution in value of the buildings, I disagree with the majority’s reasoning.

The majority explains the rationale for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Panorama Village Homeowners v. Golden RuleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. P. G. Lake, Inc. v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Andrulis v. Levin Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API