Legal Opinion

Wolke v. Schmidt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The complaint avers that the defendants are the owners of four lots in a certain block in Grants Pass and that the parties to this suit entered into a contract by which, in consideration of the promise of the defendants to pay thirteen cents per square foot, the plaintiffs were to lay a concrete floor in a building then being erected on the four lots mentioned, to be made of cement, sand and gravel,- the base of which was to be one part of cement to three parts of sand and five parts of gravel and the top coating or finish to be one-half inch…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tribou & McPhee v. StrowbridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Hannan v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. O. C. Gove & Co. v. Island City Mercantile & Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Easton v. QuackenbushOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Murray's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kelley Et Ux. v. Mallory Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Bradfield v. BollierOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McComb v. CogswellOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. De Young v. CrooksOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Gillis v. GilletteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API