Legal Opinion

Graf v. Petry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, as an original contractor, furnished material and performed labor at the special instance and request of the defendants in the construction of a building, “and completed said building on August 23, 1922.” The prayer of the complaint is for the reasonable value of the material and labor furnished, and not for the price stipulated to be paid therefor. There is no allegation in the complaint or in the reply of any of the terms of the contract, or of the price stipulated to be paid for the furnishing of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Borkstrom v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Finn v. Diamond Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McComb v. CogswellOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Allen v. RoufsOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Lew Williams Cadillac, Inc. v. GoldmanOregon Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API