Legal Opinion

Birkemeier v. Knobel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Since four of the assignments of error are based upon rulings concerning the pleadings, we shall now briefly review the averments affected by these charges. The complaint alleges:

“At the time plaintiff commenced to furnish material and labor in the construction of said building as hereinafter described, defendants were and now are owners of said building m * *; the construction of said building was being done at the instance and request of said defendants; between August 1, 1932 and January 15, 1933, plaintiff herein, at the special instance and request of the defendants, furnished material…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pippy v. WinslowOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Richardson v. Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Avery v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Badger Lumber Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Maynard v. LangeOregon Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kauaian Development Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Mathis v. Thunderbird Village, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Nelson v. HazelIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Andersen v. TurpinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. East Side Mill & Lumber Co. v. Southeast Portland Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API