Legal Opinion
Lungren v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 12, 1996No. C024367PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Petitioner, the Attorney General of the State of California, seeks a peremptory writ of mandate directing respondent superior court to vacate its judgment entered August 2, 1996, insofar as it compels the Attorney General to revise the ballot title and ballot label for Proposition 209 consistent with the statements of respondent superior court made during the August 1,1996, hearing to “reflect that the chief purpose of the measure is to prohibit affirmative action programs by public entities that are inconsistent with the prohibition in the measure.” To preserve our…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Epperson v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Healdsburg Police Officers Ass'n v. City of HealdsburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Coalition for Economic Equity v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Jones v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Kidd v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.