Legal Opinion

People v. Frierson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1979No. Docket Nos. Crim. 20624, 20882PublishedCited by 364 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

Defendant Lavelle Frierson appeals from a judgment imposing the death penalty following his conviction of first degree murder and other lesser offenses. He also seeks a writ of habeas corpus based on his claim that he was ineffectively represented by his trial counsel. These proceedings have been consolidated so that they may be reviewed together. We have concluded that, while the contentions raised on defendant’s appeal lack merit, the uncontradicted facts presented in his habeas corpus pleadings disclose that defendant was deprived of adequate and effective…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by364 opinions

  1. Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

359 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API