Legal Opinion

Kidd v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1998No. C009484PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

The appellants (hereafter plaintiffs) appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs challenge an affirmative action program, the State Personnel Board’s policy of “supplemental certification,” which allows certain minority and female applicants for positions in the state civil' service to be considered for employment even though they did not place in the top three ranks of the list of eligible candidates. The named defendants, the State of California (State), the State Personnel Board (Board), and the Department of Fish and Game (Department)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Marin County Board of Realtors, Inc. v. PalssonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Traders Sports, Inc. v. City of San LeandroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. TRADERS SPORTS v. City of San LeandroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. In re LovetonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API