Legal Opinion

Epperson v. Jordan

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1938No. S. F. 16101; S. F. 16098PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Wallace Sheehan and Fred M. Cross for Petitioner in S. F. No. 16098.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioners, qualified electors and taxpayers of the state, by separate applications, seek writs of mandate directed to the Secretary of State commanding him (1) to refrain from submitting a certain purported initiative measure to the electors of the state, and (2) not to certify ithe measure to the registrars of voters and county clerks of the state. After the issuance of the alternative writs the respondent, by way of answer and return, filed general demurrers to the petitions. Inasmuch as the two petitions involve substantially the same contentions both will be disposed of in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Boyd v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Clark v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. California Teachers Assn. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Abbott v. McNuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bailey v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Kasler v. LockyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. McFadden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API