Legal Opinion

Coalition for Economic Equity v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1997No. Nos. 97-15030, 97-15031PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether a provision of the California Constitution prohibiting public race and gender preferences violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution.

I

A

On November 5, 1996, the people of the State of California adopted the California Civil Rights Initiative as an amendment to their Constitution. The initiative, which appeared on the ballot as Proposition 209, provides in relevant part that

[t]he state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Kelly N. Pryor Warren E. Spivey, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Alisal Water Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Muhammad v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Hawkins v. Comparet-CassaniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API