Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bates

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1997No. 97-15914PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a deep and seemingly intractable conflict between principles at the heart of our representative government: the right of the people to choose whom they please to govern them, and the authority of a state to determine the structure of its political system. It also raises the novel question whether, when the people vote on an initiative measure that, if enacted, would severely limit a fundamental, constitutional right, they must be given adequate notice of the measure’s effect.

In 1990, by a narrow margin, California voters passed Proposition 140,…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Clarke v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  2. Bates v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Club Misty, Inc., Doing Business as Tequila Roadhouse v. James Laski, Clerk of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of SutterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
  5. Richard D. Warren Elizabeth K. Warren v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API