Jones v. Bates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This case involves a deep and seemingly intractable conflict between principles at the heart of our representative government: the right of the people to choose whom they please to govern them, and the authority of a state to determine the structure of its political system. It also raises the novel question whether, when the people vote on an initiative measure that, if enacted, would severely limit a fundamental, constitutional right, they must be given adequate notice of the measure’s effect.
In 1990, by a narrow margin, California voters passed Proposition 140,…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Clarke v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Bates v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Club Misty, Inc., Doing Business as Tequila Roadhouse v. James Laski, Clerk of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of SutterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
- Richard D. Warren Elizabeth K. Warren v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.