Legal Opinion
Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 29, 1991PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRODY, Justice.
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (“Douglas Dynamics”) appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penob-scot County, Silsby, J.) in favor of Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. (“Maine Bonding”) in a declaratory judgment action to determine whether Maine Bonding has a duty to defend Douglas Dynamics in a suit filed against Douglas Dynamics by a former employee. On appeal, Douglas Dynamics contends that summary judgment should not have been granted because Maine Bonding has a duty to defend count six of the former employee’s amended complaint which alleges emotional distress…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Bard v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- State Mutual Insurance v. BraggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Burns v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Lavoie v. DORCHESTER MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
3Cited by20 opinions
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Dawn M. Harlor v. Amica Mutual Insurance COmpanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Mitchell v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Vigna v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- York Insurance Group of Maine v. LambertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.