Legal Opinion

Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance v. Dodge

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 12, 1981PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERNICK, Justice.

Defendant Bernard R. Dodge has appealed from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Washington County) in an action in which Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance Company is the plaintiff, and one Victor Mahar is joined as another defendant. The plaintiff sought a declaratory adjudication that it is not under a duty to afford Dodge, as its insured, a defense to a civil action Mahar had brought against Dodge. The Superior Court decided that plaintiff has no such obligation to Dodge.

The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff company insured Dodge under a homeowner’s liability policy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Ambassador Insurance Company v. MontesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Ruby WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Northwestern National Casualty Co. v. PhalenMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Lyons v. Hartford Ins. GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Breland v. SchillingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. James Graham Brown Foundation, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API