Legal Opinion

York Insurance Group of Maine v. Lambert

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 24, 1999PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWathen, C.J.

[¶ 1] Defendant Richard 0. Lambert appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) in favor of his insurer, plaintiff York Insurance Group of Maine, ruling that it had no duty by virtue of a policy of homeowner’s insurance to defend Lambert in an underlying probate action. Because the court erred in considering evidence beyond the pleadings, we vacate the judgment.

[¶ 2] The facts as developed for purposes of summary judgment may be summarized as follows: Margaret Umbaugh, individually as an heir-at-law entitled to an intestate share, and together…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Hanover Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Penney v. Capitol City Transfer, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Vigna v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Auto Europe, LLC v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Dawn M. Harlor v. Amica Mutual Insurance COmpanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  3. Mitchell v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  4. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance v. Timothy S. Keiter, P.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. York Insurance of Maine, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API