Legal Opinion

Burns v. Middlesex Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 25, 1989PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORNBY, Justice.

Does an insurance carrier have an obligation to defend under a homeowner’s insurance policy when the insured is sued for bodily injury resulting from slander, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress? The policy excludes from coverage “bodily injury ... which is expected or intended by the insured.” Since under the complaint in the underlying action the injured party could recover amounts that would not be excluded by this provision, we conclude that there is a duty to defend. We therefore vacate the summary judgment entered by the Superior Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. DingwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. American Policyholders' Insurance v. KyesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. J.A.J., Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Flocco v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Home Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. Perreault v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  4. Vigna v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API