Legal Opinion
Clark v. Feder, Semo & Bard, P.C.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 22, 2010No. Civil Action 07-0470(JDB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Denise Clark brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against the law firm Feder, Semo & Bard (“Feder Semo”), the Feder Semo Retirement Plan and Trust (“Retirement Plan” or “Plan”), and two former trustees of the Retirement Plan, Joseph Semo and Howard Bard. Contending that defendants improperly denied her the full value of her retirement benefits, Clark asserts a claim for individual benefits pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), and a derivative claim for breach of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clark v. Feder, Semo & Bard, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Zalduondo v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Clark v. Feder, Semo & Bard, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.