Legal Opinion
Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, P.C.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 15, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2007-0470PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Denise Clark brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), alleging that defendants improperly denied her a significant portion of her retirement benefits. Defendants are the law firm Feder, Semo & Bard (“Feder Semo” or “the firm”) (Clark’s former employer), the Feder Semo Retirement Plan and Trust (“Plan”), and two former trustees of the Plan, Joseph Semo and Howard Bard. The Court conducted a six-day bench trial beginning on April 23, 2012, on plaintiffs three remaining claims in the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Rhodes v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Perez v. C.R. Calderon Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Girdler v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Bederson v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.