Legal Opinion
Clark v. Feder, Semo & Bard, P.C.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 7, 2011No. Civil Action 07-0470 (JDB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Denise Clark brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against the law firm Feder, Semo & Bard (“Feder Semo”), the Feder Semo Retirement Plan and Trust (“Retirement Plan” or “Plan”), and two former trustees of the Retirement Plan, Joseph Semo and Howard Bard. On March 22, 2010, the Court granted summary judgment for defendants on all but plaintiffs improper grouping claim. Clark v. Feder Semo & Bard, P.C., 697 F.Supp.2d 24 (D.D.C.2010) (“Clark II ”). On…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Zalduondo v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Boster v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.