Legal Opinion

Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, P.C.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 7, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2007-0470Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DENISE M. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 07-0470 (JDB) FEDER, SEMO & BARD, P.C., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Denise Clark brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq., against the law firm Feder, Semo & Bard ("Feder Semo"), the Feder Semo Retirement Plan and Trust ("Retirement Plan" or "Plan"), and two former trustees of the Retirement Plan, Joseph Semo and Howard Bard. On March 22, 2010, the Court granted summary judgment for defendants…

2Cases cited42 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.