Legal Opinion
Clark v. Feder, Semo & Bard, P.C.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 13, 2010No. Civil Action 07-0470 (JDB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Denise Clark seeks reconsideration of the Court’s March 22, 2010 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part summary judgment to the defendants in this action — the law firm Feder, Semo & Bard (“Feder Semo”), the Feder Semo Retirement Plan and Trust (“Retirement Plan” or “Plan”), and two former trustees of the Retirement Plan, Joseph Semo and Howard Bard. See PL’s Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for Reconsideration (“PL’s Mem.”) [Docket Entry 77]; see also Clark v. Feder, Semo & Bard, P.C., 697 F.Supp.2d 24 (D.D.C.2010). The parties,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clark v. Feder, Semo & Bard, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Zalduondo v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Musick v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Fonville v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.