Legal Opinion

Kelso v. Kelso

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1896No. 1,888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From tbe Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This cause was transferred to this court by the Supreme Court, as belonging within this court’s jurisdiction. '

The appellee, Joseph B. Kelso, filed his complaint against his co-appellee, Kate Brouillette and the appellant James I. Kelso, as follows:

“The plaintiff complains of the defendants, and says, that heretofore, on the 19th day of November, 1882, one Jerome T. Kelso was largely involved financially, and had been for a long time prior thereto, and that on said day and for a long time prior thereto, plaintiffs were and had been securities for said Jerome T. Kelso, for the purpose of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Peerless Stone Co. v. WrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Wright v. MoodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Miller v. Evansville & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Sanders v. WeelburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. FertichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. NormanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Seybold v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Taylor v. RegerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API