Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Fertich

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1897No. 1,984PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

A claim of the appellee, in the form of an account, presented to the appellant, was in part allowed and in part disallowed by the board. The claimant appealed to the court below. There, the claimant filed a second paragraph of complaint. A demurrer for want of sufficient facts was sustained as to the first paragraph, and overruled as to the second. .

Issues were formed which were tried by the court. A finding of facts with conclusion of law thereon was rendered and filed by the court, the appellant excepting to the conclusion of law.

The appellant’s motion for a venire de novo having…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Branch v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Board of Commissioners v. AllmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Gavin v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Street v. Shoe Carnival, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Davis v. Steuben School TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Wrought Iron Bridge Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. First National Bank v. Adams School TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API