Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Norman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1897No. 2,151PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellee’s complaint against the appellant, to recover the value of cattle killed by being run against by the appellant’s locomotive and cars, consisted of six paragraphs.

In the appellant’s ’ assignment of errors there are seven specifications. Each one of the first six specifications seeks to question in this court for the first time the sufficiency of a separate paragraph of the complaint. There is no assignment addressed to the question of the sufficiency of the entire complaint.

The statute, section 667, Burns’ R. S. 1894 (655, Horner’s R. S, 1896), requires that the assignment of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Shular v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Haymond v. SaucerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Combs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Worley v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Choen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Ice & Coal Co. v. ElischerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Lautman v. PepinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Petrie v. LudwigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Colles v. Lake Cities Electric Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Van Horn v. MercerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API