Seybold v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Cass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Black, J. —
The appellant sued the appellee, the
action being based upon the provisions of section 5153, Burns’ R. S. 1894 (3903, Horner’s R.S.1896), that every railroad corporation shall possess powers, and be subject to liabilities and restrictions, “to construct its road upon or across any stream of water, water course, road, highway, railroad or canal, so as not to interfere with the free use of the same, which the route of its road shall intersect, in such manner as to afford security for life and property; but the corporation shall restore the stream or water course, road or highway, thus…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Board of Commissioners v. BonebrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. State ex rel. ZimmermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Evansville & Indianapolis Railroad v. AllenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GrebIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.