Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1899No. 2,759PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Newton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

This is an action commenced by the appellant against the appellee to recover damage for an alleged breach of contract of purchase by appellee of appellant of one McCormick Harvester Binder. The contract of purchase was in writing. The complaint is in two paragraphs. Appellee filed five paragraphs of answer, the first being a general denial. Appellant *618demurred to the second, third, fourth, and fifth paragraphs of answer, which demurrer the court overruled, and appellant replied in general denial. The cause, being at issue, was submitted to a jury for trial, which resulted in a verdict in favor…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Peerless Stone Co. v. WrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Cargar v. FeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Board of Commissioners v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Lawrence v. Van BuskirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. South Bend Chilled Plow Co. v. GeidieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Prudential Insurance v. SullivanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Federal Union Surety Co. v. SchlosserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Robinsons v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Miller v. Armstrong-Landon Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API