Legal Opinion

City of Victorville v. County of San Bernardino

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1991No. C007609PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, J.

This case involves a dispute between cities and a county over the lifeblood of local governments: revenue.

As a general rule, counties must share with their cities the fines and forfeitures collected upon convictions in criminal cases. (Pen. Code § 1463; further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.) An exception exists for fines collected by a county probation officer “as a condition of the granting of probation or as a part of the terms of probation, . . .” (§ 1203.1.) With limited exceptions, such fines shall be placed in the general fund…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Michael G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Viking Pools, Inc. v. MaloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. People v. GLEECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. People v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. People v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. DisibioAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API