City of Victorville v. County of San Bernardino
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, J.
This case involves a dispute between cities and a county over the lifeblood of local governments: revenue.
As a general rule, counties must share with their cities the fines and forfeitures collected upon convictions in criminal cases. (Pen. Code § 1463; further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.) An exception exists for fines collected by a county probation officer “as a condition of the granting of probation or as a part of the terms of probation, . . .” (§ 1203.1.) With limited exceptions, such fines shall be placed in the general fund…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Michael G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Viking Pools, Inc. v. MaloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. GLEECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. DisibioAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.