Legal Opinion
People v. Disibio
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided April 7, 1992No. Crim A. No. 2369PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOGEL, P. J.
Statement of the Case
Appellant Christina Disibio was charged in municipal court complaint No. C8955109 with being under the influence of phencyclidine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11550). Although this is a divertible offense pursuant to Penal Code *Supp 4section 1000, subdivision (a),1 the district attorney determined that appellant was not eligible for diversion because of a prior revocation of probation. (§ 1000, subd. (a)(4).)
The trial court denied appellant’s motion to compel diversion, holding that pretrial review of determinations of ineligibility for diversion is not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. WindhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- King v. Thierry S.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Sledge v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. GLEECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. Lorta CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Owens CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015
- United States v. CollinsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998