Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 2003No. D039485PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (Reynolds) appeals a summary judgment favoring plaintiff the People of the State of California on the People’s complaint for enforcement of a master settlement agreement (MSA). Reynolds contends the court erred in concluding Reynolds violated an MSA provision limiting outdoor advertising of tobacco *520products. Since Reynolds has not demonstrated reversible error, the summary judgment must be upheld.
I
Introduction
We review the summary judgment de novo. (Sambrano v. City of San Diego (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 225, 235 [114 Cal.Rptr.2d 151].)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Halicki Films, LLC v. Sanderson Sales & MarketingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- In Re Tobacco Cases ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.