Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shryock

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 18, 2009No. AG 16, September Term, 2007, AG 68, September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Sept. Term, 2007, Sept. Term, 2007.

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

We have before us two petitions for disciplinary or remedial action filed by Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, against respondent, Charles M. Shryock, III. Although the petitions were filed separately, involve different matters, and were referred to different judges for hearing, upon our receipt of the findings and conclusions of the hearing judges, we consolidated the petitions and decided to address the matters in this one Opinion. We note, at the outset, that Shryock has been indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Maryland since October 2, 2005.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-MahoiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. TankoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. LangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SeltzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API