Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Fox

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 20, 2010No. Misc. Docket AG No. 6PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary Action or Remedial Action against Respondent, attorney David E. Fox. The petition addresses Respondent’s representation in two cases: an automobile accident case in which he represented Ronnie E. Miller and David A. Pearson; and an automobile accident case in which he represented Abdul M. Barrie.

Pursuant to Md. Rule 16-752, we designated the Honorable Marielsa Bernard of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to hear the matter and make findings of fact and conclusions of law in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. De La PazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Van NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API