Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tanko
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action (“Petition”) against Respondent, attorney Louis P. Tánico. The petition concerns Respondent’s conduct in two separate client matters: the representation of Mr. Howard G. Brown for post-conviction remedies; and the representation of Ms. Jan’e Colahar (a.k.a. Puranda) in an employment compensation case.
We transmitted the matter to the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County and designated the Honorable William C. Mulford, II of the Fifth Judicial Circuit of Maryland…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KremerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Attorney Grievance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. LangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.