Legal Opinion

Fleet Bank v. Dowling

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 14, 1992No. 10723; 10724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

These two cases involve claims by the plaintiff Fleet Bank of Connecticut that it is entitled *222to reimbursement from the defendants, Vincent J. Dowling, Sr., and Vincent J. Dowling, Jr., for the amount it paid pursuant to two irrevocable letters of credit. The cases are identical, except that in the first case a reimbursement agreement was signed by Vincent J. Dowling, Jr., in connection with a letter of credit for the benefit of a third party. In the second case, Vincent J. Dowling, Sr., signed a similar agreement. The cases were presented together in oral argument and will be considered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Dow & Condon, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Greenberg, Rhein & Margolis, Inc. v. Norris-Faye Horton Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fleet Bank v. DowlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Fleet Bank v. DowlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Haynes Construction v. Dorce, No. Cv02 0078802s (Dec. 24, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API