Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Haynes Construction v. Dorce, No. Cv02 0078802s (Dec. 24, 2002)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 24, 2002No. CV02 0078802SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY

The plaintiff, Haynes Construction Company ("Haynes"), has brought an application for prejudgment remedy against Dominique Dorce d/b/a Sunshine Construction ("Dorce") and Sunshine Masonry Construction LLC ("Sunshine"). Haynes alleges a breach of contract as its basis for a prejudgment remedy pursuant to Chapter 903a, Connecticut General Statutes. C.G.S. § 52-278d (a)(1) imposes a probable cause standard of proof on the court in determining…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Wall v. ToomeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
  3. Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  4. McCahill v. Town & Country Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Diamond Match Co. v. CruteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API