Legal Opinion

Lawler v. Lawler

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 11, 1989No. 13532PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

In this dissolution action, we granted the plaintiff’s petition for certification in order to consider, in light of Rubin v. Rubin, 204 Conn. 224, 527 A.2d 1184 (1987), whether a trial court may “order automatic cost of living increases in periodic alimony payments based upon the payor’s projected increase in salary.” Lawler v. Lawler, 209 Conn. 821, 551 A.2d 756 (1988). The Appellate Court, in considering this issue among others, found no error in the judgment of the trial court. Lawler v. Lawler, 16 Conn. App. 193, 195-99, 547 A.2d 89 (1988).

After examining the record on appeal and after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Lawler v. LawlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Lawler v. LawlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Graham v. GrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. Rummel v. RummelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Burns v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Vandal v. VandalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API