Legal Opinion
Kressly v. District Bond Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 1934No. Civ. No. 8234PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, J., pro tem.
Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in an action for damages for breach of contract.
Prior to January 18, 1923, appellant corporation, being engaged in the business of buying and selling bonds for investment purposes, purchased a number of bonds of the Sunnyside Irrigation District of Washington County, Idaho, and offered' same to respondent for sale. About January 18, 1923, respondent purchased from appellant four one thousand dollar six per cent bonds of said district maturing February 1, 1933, interest payable semi-annually on February 1st and August 1st,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Walker v. Harbor Business Blocks Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Hellings v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hopper v. Lennen & Mitchell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Plumlee v. PoagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Abramson v. Delrose, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.