Legal Opinion
Plumlee v. Poag
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 6, 1984No. Civ. 68711PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHAUER, P. J.
Plaintiff Plumlee appeals from an order of dismissal entered after the court sustained defendants’ general demurrer, without leave to amend, to appellant’s second amended complaint for breach of contract. Two issues are before this court: First, whether Plumlee’s claim is barred for failure to comply with the limitations period contained in Probate Code section 714; and second, whether the alleged oral contract is subject to the defense of the statute of frauds as contained in Civil Code section 1624, subdivisions 1 and 6. We will decide both issues in favor of Plumlee…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Blake v. . VoigtNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Glaire v. La Lanne-Paris Health Spa, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
- White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Buford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Sorosky v. Burroughs Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Gray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.