Legal Opinion
State v. Kantner
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 1972No. 4995, 5005PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*328OPINION OF
RICHARDSON, C. J.,
IN WHICH MARUMOTO, J., JOINS, ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The sole issue presented in this consolidated appeal is the constitutionality of the statutory scheme for the control of the possession of marihuana. HRS § 329-5, as amended by Act 161, S.L.H. 1969, which served as the basis of parole revocation of petitioners Nowell and Winter and upon which defendant Kantner was convicted, provides as follows:
Additional acts prohibited; penalty. No person shall knowingly . . . possess . . . any narcotic drug as defined by section 329-1 except as provided in this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. John C. KifferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.