Legal Opinion

State v. Ogata

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1977No. 5822PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MENOR, J.

The defendants appeal from the judgment and sentence of the trial court based upon their convictions for the offense of carrying a deadly weapon, in violation of HRS § 134-51. The recovery of a sheathed sword-cane, which was found lying against the raised transmission tunnel in front of the center portion of the front seat of the defendants’ vehicle, and wooden knuckles with shark’s teeth embedded in the striking surface, which were found on the floor of the vehicle, supplied the basis for the charge. Both of these instruments were “deadly or dangerous weapons”…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. Steven Linwood RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. State v. GoudyHawaii Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. WyattHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. State v. BolosanHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. PowellHawaii Supreme Court · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API