Legal Opinion

Sperrazza v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1983No. 2873PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment entered on a jury’s verdict for appellee,- Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company, in an action of assumpsit to recover under a policy of fire insurance. Appellants, Frank and Angela Sperrazza, were the owners of improved real estate located at 536-538 Schultz Court, Scranton, having purchased the property in May of 1979. The building was destroyed by a fire, incendiary in origin, on November 19, 1979. The insurance company denied liability under the policy, contending that the fire had been set by or at the instance of the insureds for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Ditz v. MarshallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Yandrich v. RadicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Olson v. DietzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Northwest Savings Ass'n v. DistlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Pachesky v. GetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Fleck v. Durawood Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API