Legal Opinion

Fleck v. Durawood Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1987No. 0074PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

Appellants, Durawood, Inc. (Durawood) and Sears, Roebuck and Company (Sears), appeal from an Order by the trial court which denied their motion for new trial or judgment n.o.v. This Court reverses the lower court’s denial of appellant/Sears’ motion for judgment n.o.v. but will permit the verdict to stand as to Durawood.

At trial, appellee sought recovery of commissions he allegedly earned as a salesman of kitchen improvement jobs. A jury awarded appellee recovery against both defendants. Appellee was hired by Durawood (T.T. 10/2/86, p. 84). Durawood had an arrangement with Sears…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pratt v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Broxie v. Household Finance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Timbrook v. Foremost InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. McDevitt v. Terminal Warehouse Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. HodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smith v. RenautSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Lira v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Donald Dwayne Whatley v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Wilson v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Stahli v. WittmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API