Legal Opinion

Northwest Savings Ass'n v. Distler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1986No. 00975PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

In this appeal, appellants seek our review of the entry of judgment non obstante veredicto (hereinafter “judgment n.o.v.”) by the trial court. Appellee instituted an action in mortgage foreclosure when appellants refused to pay the alleged balance due on their mortgage. A jury returned a verdict in favor of appellants; following oral argument, however, appellee’s post-verdict motion for a judgment n.o.v. was granted. That order is the subject of this appeal.

In April of 1970, appellants applied to appellee for a second mortgage on their residence in the amount of $5,000 to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Loyal Christian Benefit Ass'n v. BenderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Jones v. TreegoobSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Olson v. DietzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Reichman v. WallachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hoy v. AngeloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Smith v. RenautSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Berman v. Radnor Rolls, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API