Legal Opinion

Ditz v. Marshall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1978No. 138PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant initiated this action in trespass for damages resulting from injuries to person and property sustained by appellant and his son in a collision with appel-lee’s vehicle. The jury found appellee non-negligent and appellant requested a new trial. The lower court denied the motion. Appellant asks this court to reverse the lower court’s decision, arguing that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. After careful review of the record we rule in appellant’s favor and grant a new trial.

The accident giving rise to this appeal occurred on April 20, 1972…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Austin v. RidgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Abbott v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. MARTIN v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Tyus v. RestaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. McGowan v. Devonshire Hall ApartmentsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Lanning v. WestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API