Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Aetna Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1967No. Appeal, 133PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Eagen,

This is an action instituted by the insured on two separate fire insurance policies to recover the loss resulting from a fire in a shopping center where he owned and operated a drug store. At trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and from the judgment entered thereon the defendants appeal.

In their answers to the complaint, the defendant-insurance companies denied liability on the contracts because the fire “was the result of incendiarism, a fact well known to the plaintiff who participated therein, and . . . such participation and failure to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Easton v. Washington County InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Evans v. MarksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Bobereski, Adm. v. Ins. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. American Fire Insurance v. HazenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. Koonts v. Farmers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Butler v. Flo-Ron Vending Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Maravich v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Bell v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Mele v. All-Star Ins. Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Sperrazza v. Cambridge Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API