Legal Opinion

Seal v. Polehn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 26, 1981No. 77-5-266, CA 16932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit for specific performance of an earnest money agreement after both sellers had died 1 and defendants, as co-personal representatives of the estate of their mother, the last of the two sellers to die, refused to perform that agreement. Defendants appeal from a decree in favor of plaintiff (buyer), contending that the trial court erred in failing to find in defendants’ favor on one or all of their affirmative defenses: illegality, breach of fiduciary relationship, unclean hands, misrepresentation and mutual mistake. Plaintiff cross-appeals, contending that the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Jewell v. Triple B. Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Seal v. PolehnOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. MacDonald v. DormaierOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Long v. StormsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Mountain Fir Lumber Co. v. Employee Benefits Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Yamhill County v. LudwickOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Sizemore v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Yamhill County v. LudwickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API