Legal Opinion

Sizemore v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1985No. A8209-05730; CA A30220PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In this action to recover the balance due under a land sale contract, defendants (buyers) appeal from a judgment requiring them to pay more than they contend is owing. Plaintiff (seller) cross-appeals, claiming that buyers owe more than the court awarded him. The dispute centers on whether the contract required buyers to pay the real property taxes.

Both parties are experienced real estate investors. The contract, prepared by seller’s attorney, provided for a down payment of $17,000 and a $70,000 contract balance, with interest at 10 percent, to be paid in monthly installments of $662 starting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. NEW ZEALAND INSURANCE CO. v. Griffith Rubber MillsOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Seal v. PolehnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Co-Gen Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Slocum v. LangCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API