Legal Opinion

Seal v. Polehn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1978No. 77-5-266, SC 25494PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of an earnest money receipt relating to the sale of real property. Defendant filed a demurrer to the complaint on the ground the complaint failed to state a cause of suit, contending the earnest money receipt was too indefinite to allow specific performance. The court believed the consideration was illusory, and there was no mutuality of obligation, and sustained the demurrer. Plaintiff appeals.

The agreement in question is a standard form "Earnest Money Receipt.” The receipt shows that plaintiff Seal was both the purchaser and the broker for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Van v. FoxOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Howard v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Landura Corporation v. SchroederOregon Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. David M. Scott Construction Corp. v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Genest v. John Glenn CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Skuffeeda v. St. Vincent Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Wallstreet Properties, Inc. v. GassnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API